What order should I play Tomb Raider III?

When it comes to playing the classic action-adventure game Tomb Raider III, one of the most debated topics is the optimal order to play the levels. With three distinct regions to explore - Nevada, London, and Pacific - the game offers a unique experience, and the sequence in which you visit each location can significantly impact your overall gaming experience.

For those who are familiar with the game, the common consensus is that the order in which you play the levels affects the availability of weapons and resources. However, for those who, like this poll respondent, tend to cheat, the traditional importance of this particular aspect is diminished, leaving the player to consider other factors when deciding the ideal order.

Some players argue that starting in Nevada, the first region, allows for a better flow of exploration and combat, setting the tone for the rest of the game. This approach enables the player to become familiar with Lara Croft's movements and actions, preparing them for the challenges that lie ahead.

On the other hand, playing the levels in the Pacific region first, followed by London, and finally Nevada, can create an intriguing narrative arc. This order introduces the player to a more tropical and mysterious setting, quickly transitioning to the more industrialized and dark environments of London, before culminating in the sun-scorched desert landscapes of Nevada.

Lastly, some players might argue that playing the regions in the order London, Pacific, and Nevada, allows for a well-rounded experience. This sequence offers a gradual progression from the gritty cityscapes to the lush jungles, and finally, to the vast deserts.

So, the question remains: what order should I play Tomb Raider III? Should I follow the traditional route, starting with Nevada and exploring the worlds from there, or try something different? Cast your vote and share your perspective on this age-old debate!